Home » Maximising Wireless Profit Program » 2003 » Churn Prevention Strategies in Cellular Markets/CRM » Handset Subsidy Reduction: Strategies & ConsequencesJune 2002 (29 pages)
The last 18 months have seen a major change in the attitude of mobile operators to handset subsidies. Declining revenues associated with new connections has meant that operators have had to re-evaluate the business case for handset subsidies. Recent research conducted by Mobile Market Development suggests that 40% of mobile customers never become profitable. This is primarily due to the initial cost incurred by operators when acquiring customers. In many markets, handset subsidies account for at least 50% of the total cost of acquisition.
A recent financial benchmarking report prepared by Mobile Market Development demonstrated that mobile operators such as Sonera and TIM, with Industry leading EBITDA profit margins of approximately 50%, benefit from particularly low costs of customer acquisition. Both benefit significantly from the absence of subsidies in their respective markets. Meanwhile, mobile operators who are active in markets where handset subsidies apply have found it difficult to move EBITDA margin levels above 35%.
The reduction or elimination of handset subsidies improves the bottom line in two ways. Clearly it impacts profits directly through the reduced cost of customer acquisition/retention. However, at least as important is the fact that lower churn results in markets where low or zero subsidies apply.
Price: EUR 1,250.00 / GBP 1,200.00 if you would like learn more about this report, or our other work in this topic area and how to subscribe, please contact us 1 Handset Subsidy Reduction: Strategies & Consequences 1
1.1 The Argument for Subsidy Removal 1
1.2 Subsidy Reduction Triggers 3
1.3 Exploiting Legal or Regulatory Arguments for the Removal of Subsidies 3
1.4 Challenges Associated with Subsidy Reduction 4
1.4.1 Overcoming Dealer Anxiety and Retaining Dealers to Retain Customers 4
1.4.2 Improving Supply Chain Management 4
1.4.3 Dealing With Customer Shock 5
1.4.4 Other Preparatory Steps 5
1.5 Need to Pressurise Manufacturers for Better Quality Handsets 6
1.6 Further Findings 6
1.7 Australia 8
1.7.1 Details of Handset Subsidy Reduction/Removal 8
1.7.2 Parallel Churn Prevention Measures 10
1.7.3 Impact on Financial Performance 11
1.7.4 Impact on Connection Levels 11
1.7.5 Channel and Other Impacts 12
1.8 France 13
1.8.1 Channel and Other Impacts 14
1.9 Germany 15
1.10 Greece 15
1.10.1 Background 15
1.10.2 Details of Handset Subsidy Reduction/Removal 16
1.10.3 Impact on Financial Performance 17
1.10.4 Related Initiatives 17
1.10.5 Impact on Handset Replacement Cycle 19
1.11 Ireland 19
1.11.1 Background 19
1.11.2 Details of Handset Subsidy Reduction/Removal 20
1.11.3 Impact of Subsidy Reduction 21
1.12 Portugal 21
1.12.1 Background 21
1.12.2 Details of Handset Subsidy Reduction/Removal 21
1.12.3 Related Initiatives 22
1.13 Impacts 23
1.14 Spain 24
1.14.1 Background 24
1.14.2 Parallel Initiatives 24
1.14.3 Telefonica - Financial Impact of Handset Subsidy Reduction 24
1.14.4 Competitor Reaction 25
1.14.5 Impact on Churn 25
1.14.6 Impact on Handset Lifecycle/Equipment upgrades 26
1.14.7 Impact on Connection Levels 26
1.15 Netherlands 26
1.15.1 Background 26
1.15.2 Details of Handset Subsidy Reduction/Removal 27
1.15.3 Channel and Other Impacts 27
1.16 Denmark - Orange 28
1.16.1 Background 28
1.16.2 Details of Handset Subsidy Reduction/Removal 28
1.16.3 Competitor Reaction 28
1.16.4 Other Impacts 29
1.17 Other Markets 29
1.17.1 South Korea 29
1.17.2 Hong Kong 29
1.17.3 USA 29 |