|
|
|
||||||
[Guest]![]() |
|
|
Home » Maximising Wireless Profit Program » 2004 » Fixed-Mobile Convergence » Analysis of Fixed Line Substitution Tariffs in the Danish MarketJuly 2004 (20 pages)This report analyses Fixed Line Substitution (FLS) strategies implemented by mobile operators in Denmark, which is host to some of the most advanced FLS propositions, both in European and global terms. FLS strategies targeting substitution of fixed line use with mobiles have varied in terms of impact. Some propositions have encouraged users to use their mobile instead of the fixed line phone for certain types of calls only while others have attempted the difficult task of persuading customers to dispense with their fixed line entirely. Danish mobile operators to have launched FLS propositions to date include Sonofon, Orange and TDC Mobile. Many mobile operators see FLS as a key ARPU stimulant, particularly since data revenues have been slow to take off. Generally, there are two key aims with FLS strategies:
The key questions we raise in this case study of the Danish market are:
By interviewing key FLS strategists and decision makers across the Danish mobile operators and MVNOs such as Sonofon, Orange and Telmore, we gain insight into their respective experiences and the rationale behind each player's strategy. In this case study of FLS in the Danish market, we analyse the approach taken by each player before answering the questions raised above. In the process, we develop a number of market development principles that can help other operators when implementing their own FLS strategies. Much can be learned from both the successes and failures experienced by operators in the Danish market. Price: EUR 2,500.00 / GBP 2,000.00 if you would like learn more about this report, or our other work in this topic area and how to subscribe, please contact us 1 Overview 1 1.1 Context and Objectives 1 1.2 Approach 1 1.3 Why Denmark? 2 2 Danish Landscape 2 2.1 Danish Market Overview 2 2.2 Key Indicators of Fixed Line Substitution in Denmark 3 2.2.1 Mobile vs. Fixed Minutes 3 2.2.2 Number of Access Lines 4 2.2.3 Single Phone Households 4 2.2.4 Key Drivers of Fixed Line Substitution 5 2.2.5 Mobile Price Reduction in Denmark 5 2.2.6 Fixed Line Incumbent Pricing 5 2.2.7 Increased Workforce Mobility 6 2.2.8 Convenience of Mobile 6 2.2.9 FLS Tariff Propositions 6 3 Fixed Line Substitution Tariffs and Propositions 6 3.1 Overview 6 3.2 Sonofon Zone (Consumer Proposition) 7 3.2.1 Overview of Consumer Proposition 7 3.2.2 Overview of Business Proposition 7 3.2.3 Activation and Architecture 7 3.2.4 Adoption 8 3.3 Orange Mono 8 3.3.1 Overview 8 3.3.2 Adoption and Recent Developments 8 3.3.3 Migration From Mono 9 3.4 Telia Unlimited 9 3.5 Discount Operators - Telmore and CBB 9 3.5.1 Overview 9 3.5.2 Adoption 10 4 FLS Tariff Analysis 10 4.1 Price Per Minute Comparison 10 4.2 Total Monthly Service Cost Comparison 11 5 Impact of FMC Opportunities 13 5.1 Sonofon 13 5.2 Orange Mono 13 5.3 Telia 14 5.4 Discount Operators 14 6 Key Learnings from FLS Deployments 14 6.1 Critical Success Factors From Deployments In Denmark 14 6.2 Issues and Considerations 14 6.2.1 Barriers to Take-Up 16 6.2.2 Encouraging On-Going Usage 17 7 FMC Development Opportunities 18 7.1 Proposition Development 18 7.1.1 Expanding the Target Market 18 7.1.2 Enhancing Existing FLS Propositions 18 7.2 Developing FLS Specific Marketing Activities 18 7.3 Fixed Wireless Broadband Services 19 7.4 Fixed Mobile Number Portability 19 8 Conclusions 20 |
Terms Of Use & Privacy Statement | ©2002 - 2008 Mobile Market Development Ltd.
|